OK, the rule goes like this: If there is some technology that could use an update, then I just have to buy it and the update will happen a few days later.

Apple released 16GB iPhones and 32GB iPod Touches.

I'm cool with Moore's Law and all, but this is just silly. It happened with my MacBook and my Canon SLR within a week, too.

This isn't a political blog, but I have to thank my friend Bryan for pointing this out: The Apple Fanboy's President: Barack Obama (Obama's Top Ten List on Letterman).

Nice!

http://www.linqpad.net/

LINQPad lets you use the new LINQ language and execute queries in a lightweight environment outside of Visual Studio and SQL Management Studio.

Pros:

• Make simple queries to a database for debugging, etc.
• Get results with a LINQ query before using it in managed code.
• Use LINQ to debug data regardless of the platform of the app that uses the data. For instance, a .Net 1.1 app could be debugged with LINQ using LINQPad.

Cons:

• Queries run slower than straight SQL.
• Only works against a Mircosoft SQL Server database.
  

I just got back from a presentation by Scott Hanselman all about ASP.Net MVC.  I want to share not only a pessimistic prediction coming true, but also my optimistic views on ASP.Net MVC.

Rails is another MVC (Model View Controller) framework which most commonly uses Ruby as the programming language, hence the term "Ruby on Rails". Back in early 2007, I learned me some Ruby on Rails and got some great crash course experience creating a rather complex web app for an actual paying client. That sure was fun.

I fell in love so quickly with certain concepts of Rails and features of the framework that I came to an inevitable conclusion: Microsoft is so gonna copy this.

After seeing both of Scott Hanselman's recent presentations on ASP.Net MVC, I created this comparison (Table 1) between ASP.Net MVC and Ruby on Rails, at least the way I see it at this point. This includes what I've seen with my eyes as well as what I know MS is going to think of before they release it. It's pretty unscientific really, but check it...

	Ruby on Rails	ASP.Net MVC
Pretty Much Everything Ruby on Rails has

But anyway, now for the optimism. Here are some reasons I think ASP.Net MVC is going to be a great thing:

• Like Silverlight, .Net developers will have another tool at their disposal which does something very similar to other existing tools, but with much less of a learning curve. This may sound like an underhanded compliment, but it's true.
   
• Conversely, this framework will reduce the learning curve for those coming into ASP.Net from platforms such as Ruby on Rails, PHP, and Java. It's kinda old-skool thinking, but in a nu-skool way. Ignore the fact that the last sentence didn't make any sense at all.
   
• The framework allows what Scott calls "separation of concerns", which actually means a lot more in ASP.Net MVC than it meant back when ASP.Net 1.0 was released. It means that your presentation, logic, and data layers need not know anything about one another. If you don't know what this means, it's much too lengthy an explanation to post here, but I assure you it's nifty.
   
• Remember cursing the advent of postbacks, viewstates, and only being able to have one form tag on any page? ASP.Net MVC gets rid of these things inherently. You can have as many forms as you want, as you completely control the output (unless you keep using the old Web Controls, but you don't have to). The perceivable downside is that you have to handle posts and events by hand, but to some, that's not a bad thing (think AJAX). One huge upside is that it's super easy to change the output based on what device or platform is making the request (think cellphone, AJAX, etc).

• I tweaked the colors a bit.
• I found one of my favorite songs and added it to my page.
• I added some images that are funny if you know me.
• I added a background image and a color scheme that I like.
• I eventually went so far as to add a "splash" graphic at the top (pun totally intended).
  

1. Would facilities for social self-expression benefit your website?  It doesn't need to be a social networking site in order to qualify.
   
   
2. How can social self-expression be facilitated in your website?
   
   
3. Can customization techniques somehow be intentionally made more viral?
   
   
4. What could I/you/we do to improve upon what sites like MySpace and LiveJournal have done for social self-expression on the web?

Still testing things out and designing this puppy.

Stay tuned.